How we publish

Editorial policy

EarthSun separates fact, interpretation and speculation, keeps human approval at the publication gate and corrects the public record when warranted.

01

Evidence standards

Factual claims should rely on primary research, recognised scientific institutions, academies, universities or government science agencies. A source supports a specific claim; it does not endorse EarthSun.

02

AI assistance

AI may help structure drafts or surface questions. It may not publish automatically, invent doctrine or turn an unverified claim into copy. Material assistance is disclosed and every article remains a human editorial responsibility.

03

Corrections

Readers can identify a factual error, challenge an interpretation or suggest a stronger source. Material corrections receive a visible revision date and entry in the public change log.

04

Fact, philosophy and speculation

Articles mark the status of their important claims. Where evidence is insufficient, the honest editorial answer is that EarthSun has no settled position.